Claude vs Breyta
Most move to Breyta for a purpose-built tool for qualitative data analysis
- Fast. Deep, comprehensive answers in seconds
- Accurate. Built to minimise errors/hallucination.
- Trustworthy. Always backed by evidence.
- Scalable. Analyse hours of conversations in one go.

Trusted by research, UX and product teams at...





"Really like that it's more scalable than ChatGPT by analyzing a lot of files at the same time. Love that all insights are very accurate and are supported by quotes from the raw transcript automatically"

Comparison guide
Breyta
Claude
Purpose
Built for qualitative research (interviews, tests, notes)
General-purpose assistant with persistent memory and document context
File types supported
Audio, video, PDF, Word, TXT (auto transcription for audio/video)
PDF, Word, TXT, CSV (no transcription — must upload text-based files)
Transcription & playback
Built-in high-accuracy transcription with timestamp-linked playback
No transcription or timestamp features
Structured workflow
Yes — analyzes files individually, extracts verbatim findings, synthesizes
No — summarization or Q&A across documents, guided by prompts
Verbatim finding extraction
Yes — findings include direct quotes, cited and timestamped
No structured finding extraction; may summarize quotes
Synthesis logic
Yes — synthesizes all findings into a single coherent answer
Yes — good at thematic synthesis across long documents
Citation traceability
Yes — every answer is backed by source findings and quotes with timestamps
Often strong inline citation (esp. Claude 3 Opus), but no timestamped links
Scale & performance
Supports analysis of 30+ hours of conversation
Supports very large files (up to 150K tokens) but less file-by-file logic
Search & archive
Persistent qualitative archive + semantic keyword search + AI Q&A
No persistent archive or semantic search; project context only
Hallucination control
High — grounded, evidence-based output with structured logic
Low hallucination rates; good reliability, but still generative
Collaboration
Designed for teams — researchers, PMs, designers
Individual use; no collaboration layer
Privacy & compliance
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, PII redaction, data not used for training
Privacy-forward, but usage policies depend on tier and terms
Summary
Breyta excels in structured, evidence-grounded qualitative analysis, with researcher-first workflows, timestamped audio/video citations, and scalable, team-friendly projects.
Claude Projects are excellent for long-document comprehension, summarization, and clean synthesis, but lack structured analysis, transcription, or team collaboration features.