Claude vs Breyta

Most move to Breyta for a purpose-built tool for qualitative data analysis

  • Fast. Deep, comprehensive answers in seconds
  • Accurate. Built to minimise errors/hallucination.
  • Trustworthy. Always backed by evidence.
  • Scalable. Analyse hours of conversations in one go.
SOC 2 Type II
Data stored in Scandinavia
PII Redaction
GDPR
We don’t train our own model

Trusted by research, UX and product teams at...

"Really like that it's more scalable than ChatGPT by analyzing a lot of files at the same time. Love that all insights are very accurate and are supported by quotes from the raw transcript automatically"

Mohamed Hersi
UX Designer & User Research Lead

Comparison guide

Breyta

Claude

Purpose

Built for qualitative research (interviews, tests, notes)

General-purpose assistant with persistent memory and document context

File types supported

Audio, video, PDF, Word, TXT (auto transcription for audio/video)

PDF, Word, TXT, CSV (no transcription — must upload text-based files)

Transcription & playback

Built-in high-accuracy transcription with timestamp-linked playback

No transcription or timestamp features

Structured workflow

i

Yes — analyzes files individually, extracts verbatim findings, synthesizes

No — summarization or Q&A across documents, guided by prompts

Verbatim finding extraction

i

Yes — findings include direct quotes, cited and timestamped

No structured finding extraction; may summarize quotes

Synthesis logic

i

Yes — synthesizes all findings into a single coherent answer

Yes — good at thematic synthesis across long documents

Citation traceability

i

Yes — every answer is backed by source findings and quotes with timestamps

Often strong inline citation (esp. Claude 3 Opus), but no timestamped links

Scale & performance

i

Supports analysis of 30+ hours of conversation

Supports very large files (up to 150K tokens) but less file-by-file logic

Search & archive

i

Persistent qualitative archive + semantic keyword search + AI Q&A

No persistent archive or semantic search; project context only

Hallucination control

i

High — grounded, evidence-based output with structured logic

Low hallucination rates; good reliability, but still generative

Collaboration

i

Designed for teams — researchers, PMs, designers

Individual use; no collaboration layer

Privacy & compliance

i

SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, PII redaction, data not used for training

Privacy-forward, but usage policies depend on tier and terms

Summary

Breyta excels in structured, evidence-grounded qualitative analysis, with researcher-first workflows, timestamped audio/video citations, and scalable, team-friendly projects.

Claude Projects are excellent for long-document comprehension, summarization, and clean synthesis, but lack structured analysis, transcription, or team collaboration features.

Book a demo

We'll set up a quick demo suited to your schedule and will help you get started.

By submitting, you comply with our Privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.